Welcome to “Don’t Blink”! Every month we share public policy developments from around the world that shape people’s ability to participate in the free knowledge movement. In case you blinked last month, here are the most important advocacy topics that have kept the Wikimedia Foundation busy.

The Global Advocacy team works to advocate laws and government policies that protect the volunteer community-led Wikimedia model, Wikimedia’s people, and the Wikimedia movement’s core values. To learn more about us and the work we do with the rest of the Foundation: follow us on LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), and Bluesky; sign up for our quarterly newsletter or Wikimedia public policy mailing list; and visit our Meta-Wiki webpage.

________

Understanding online age verification and its impact on the Wikimedia projects

Over the past several years, lawmakers around the world have been passing a wide variety of legislation and regulations aimed to make using the internet safer for children. These laws differ in the kinds of platforms they target, the age ranges they intend to protect, and whether they apply to specific content, entire platforms, or even to devices. What they share in common, however, is the idea that minors should, in some way, have a different experience online than adults, whether that includes restricting access to certain features or types of content or banning them completely from using certain types of websites and services like social media.

This practice, called age gating, relies on a website or service host identifying and verifying the age of its users through a process called age verification. Age verification typically requires that a user, regardless of age, show a government ID and submit to a facial scan to prove that the ID is theirs. In fact, you may have already seen some of these requirements popping up on websites you use every day or have read headlines about users’ personally identifiable information (PII) being stolen. While the effectiveness of these laws remains to be seen, the Wikimedia Foundation has been raising concerns about how versions of these laws can impact important human rights like privacy, freedom of expression, and access to reliable information, as well as advocating that these laws be narrowly tailored to address some of the riskiest websites and services online. 

Explaining the basics of online age verification
[Read Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 of our explainer blog post series]

To provide context on this complicated legal and technical shift in internet policy, the Foundation published a three-part blog series, which explains the history of age-based restrictions online, basic concepts and technological measures of age verification, and the specific types of laws repeated across many different government initiatives. 

In Part 1, we take you through an internet policy timeline, which explores how age verification and its various requirements to show different content depending on the users’ age have evolved over time. We also shed light on why the trend of child safety online has escalated the calls for age verification in recent years. In Part 2, we spell out the meaning of terms related to age verification and explain the technical processes behind complying with age verification laws. We also highlight how age gating on public interest educational content like the Wikimedia projects could impact the human rights of Wikimedia users, especially those of minors. In Part 3, we discuss the specifics of the types of platforms and content that these laws typically target, and highlight some of the public policy advocacy work we have done in the form of “friend-of-the-court” briefs related to challenges to certain state laws requiring age verification in the United States.

If you want to be informed about the recent developments around age verification regulations, as well as the potential effects these developments might have on your rights and freedoms online, this blog post series is a great place to start learning more.

Read Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3 of our online age verification explainer blog post series.

Contributing to a public consultation on the Brazil’s ECA Digital child safety regulation
[Learn more about our response in our blog post]

As we shared early this year, Brazil has joined the global conversation around child safety and age verification online by passing the Digital Statute of the Child and Adolescent (ECA Digital). The ECA Digital established a new framework for protecting minors in digital environments, and included a sweeping requirement that app stores and certain online platforms implement age verification mechanisms to show only content deemed appropriate for minors given their age. During the drafting of the law’s regulations, we submitted comments urging the Brazilian authorities to customize the application of these regulations proportionally to a platform’s risk level, and to consider an interpretation of the law that would exempt digital public goods entirely from the age verification requirements in order to protect crucial rights like freedom of expression and access to reliable information on the internet.

In July 2026, we responded to another public consultation: Brazil’s National Data Protection Authority (ANPD) solicited comments on their proposed guidelines about how to conduct age verification. In our submission, we explained that because the draft guidelines were too broad in their definition of social media, they could potentially end up capturing digital public goods like open-source software repositories, citizen science portals, and collaborative encyclopedic platforms such as Wikipedia as well.

Addressing this overbroad definition is important because, under the guidelines, platforms considered to be social media are assumed to be accessed by minors and, consequently, are required to perform age verification. If public interest projects are mistakenly defined as social media, they will be required to do the same. We suggested that the ANPD narrow their definition to focus on platforms with high-risk features, and even to go even further by creating a framework for digital public goods that recognizes their low-risk nature and that, accordingly, prevents them from being regulated the same as social media platforms.

Learn more about our response in our blog post.

Wikimedia’s value in conversations about artificial intelligence

The Foundation has illustrated how the explosion of artificial intelligence (AI) companies and services have impacted the Wikimedia projects. We have discussed the negative impact that web scraping to create AI training data has on our technical and human resources, shared how AI companies threaten the social contract behind free and open knowledge, and talked about the technical solutions we are employing to identify and counter this impact. While the vast increase of web scraping is one of the more urgent changes arising from AI’s influence on the internet landscape, there are many other ways that AI tools interact with the Wikimedia projects. The voice of the Foundation and volunteers can contribute significantly with its experience to conversations about maintaining information integrity, making sure that AI-generated content does not entrench existing knowledge gaps, and enabling community moderation so it can remain sustainable while dealing with an influx of synthetic content on the web. 

Sharing how Wikimedia safeguards reliable information at the UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance
[Learn more about why participation at the UN is important for our advocacy goals in our blog post]

Jan Gerlach (Public Policy Director) joined the first official session of the United Nations (UN) Global Dialogue on AI Governance to discuss the impact of AI web scraping on Wikipedia and the broader knowledge commons. The UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance was established by the UN General Assembly based on recommendations in the Global Digital Compact to provide a platform for governments, academics, technology companies, civil society, and other interested parties to come together to participate in open discussions about how AI should be governed and to share their best practices. In a panel titled “Safeguarding Reliable Information in the Age of AI: Finding Common Ground,” Jan shared the negative impacts that web scraping by AI tools have on the Wikimedia Foundation’s servers and resources. He shared how Wikipedia can serve as a “canary in the coal mine” for the digital commons as a whole, establishing an early warning when these valuable shared resources are put under strain by new technologies.

Leading up to the official session, the Global Dialogue also hosted several consultations in 2026 , including a discussion held by the Office of the UN High Commissioner on Human Rights (OHCHR) that the Foundation attended last May, and will host its next official session in May of next year, 2027. It is vital that civil society organizations like the Foundation are invited to participate in discussions like these in order to continue sharing how new technologies are impacting the online information ecosystem, especially open knowledge, and to work with UN Member States to determine how to best address these impacts and build a more sustainable future for the digital commons.

Learn more about why participation at the UN is important to our advocacy goals in our blog post.

Wikimania sessions showcased how the volunteer communities are considering the relation between the Wikimedia projects and AI
[Check out our blog post for public policy advocacy sessions at Wikimania and learn in Creative Commons’ blog post about their participation at the conference]

A popular topic at the 2026 Wikimania was the implications of a world that is rapidly adopting AI at scale. The conference, held in Paris, France, this year, began with a full Day Zero of advocacy-related sessions, including a Creative Commons (CC) salon, which celebrated 25 years of the organization and included several CC staff reflecting both on their beginnings there as well as new considerations AI presents to open licensing. 

Several sessions during the week also highlighted discussions about AI: from AI’s impact on creativity to what gets lost when data is scraped without important context, and from open legal and technical questions about AI to how we can best defend Wikipedia’s reliability in the age of rapid AI-generated content. Beyond the official schedule, a pre-conference event and several side events focused on AI were also organized alongside the conference. This wide variety of topics not only shows that developments in AI are top of mind in the Wikimedian communities, but also the depth of wisdom that open knowledge communities can share in relation to this new digital landscape.

Check out our blog post for public policy advocacy sessions at Wikimania and learn in Creative Commons’ blog post about their participation at the conference.

Wikimedians denied a voice at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for a sixth time
[Read our Foundation statement to learn how and why China has vetoed the Foundation’s observer status once again]

For a sixth time, the Foundation applied to become a permanent observer at WIPO and was excluded due to a single veto from China. Despite 25 years of experience hosting one of the world’s most visited open knowledge platforms and navigating complicated and innovative copyright issues on a global scale, and even counting with the positive endorsements of many other Member States, a global community of 250,000 volunteer contributors was denied a seat at the table where the future of intellectual property policy is decided.

Even more worryingly, this year the denial was not only spurred by misrepresentations about the accuracy and neutrality of Wikimedia’s community-driven policies and practices, but also seems to signal a broader trend in suppressing legitimate participation by civil society, as evidenced by the recent cancellation of the world’s largest digital rights conference, RightsCon. The Foundation will continue to pursue accreditation at WIPO and advocate the representation of digital public goods in the world’s most influential intellectual property policy forum. 

Read our Foundation statement to learn how and why China has vetoed the Foundation’s observer status once again.

Check out the latest issue of the Global Advocacy quarterly newsletter!
[Read the newsletter and subscribe for quarterly updates]

The eleventh issue of our Global Advocacy newsletter looks closely a the topic of online age verification, launching our three part blog series on the topic with an introduction from Stan Adams (Public Policy Specialist for North America) and Amanda Jardine (Lead Counsel) explaining the value of pseudonymity online to freedom of expression and how both are threatened by these new regulations.

The newsletter also contains a cautiously optimistic update on the Foundation’s category status under the United Kingdom’s Online Safety Act (UK OSA), which will determine Wikipedia’s duties under that law. We also celebrated the Foundation joining the Digital Public Good Alliance (DPGA), highlighted a recent New York Times interview with Bernadette Meehan (CEO of the Wikimedia Foundation), and shared news about the Open the Knowledge Journalism Awards recipients and the cancellation of RightsCon.

Read more in the newsletter and subscribe for quarterly updates!

________

“Don’t Blink” is for you! Please take one minute to complete our survey about how our monthly public policy advocacy recap meets your needs and reflects your interests. Thank you for reading, every month, about how the open knowledge movement shapes discussions and decisions about the future of the internet!

________

Follow us on LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter), and Bluesky; sign up for our quarterly newsletter to receive updates; join our Wikipedia public policy mailing list; and visit our Meta-Wiki webpage. We hope to see you there!

The Wikimedia movement’s commitment to preserving and sharing knowledge took on a uniquely South African flavour last month as newly appointed Wikimedia Foundation CEO Bernadette Meehan embarked on one of her first major international visits since assuming the role.

Accompanying her was Bobby Shabangu, a respected South African open-knowledge advocate and the first African ever elected to the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. Together, they spent time with Wikimedia South Africa volunteers, partners, and community members, exploring how local initiatives are helping ensure African languages, histories, and cultures are represented online for generations to come.

Cape Town: Where Ancient Stories Meet the Digital Future

The South African tour began in Cape Town with a visit to the Iziko Museum, where participants experienced a guided tour that perfectly reflected the Wikimedia movement’s belief that knowledge is created, shared, and preserved by people.

Among the highlights was a presentation of some of South Africa’s oldest rock art. Created over centuries by multiple generations, these artworks offered a striking parallel to the way Wikipedia itself is built today — collaboratively, incrementally, and collectively. Just as countless hands contributed to preserving stories on stone, volunteers across the world continue to build humanity’s largest collection of freely accessible knowledge.

Conversations with Cape Town-based Wikimedia South Africa board members and partners took visitors further “down the WikiRabbit Hole,” exploring innovative language preservation projects currently underway. Particular interest was shown in efforts supporting the incubation of Afrikaaps, a Cape Town dialect of Afrikaans, as well as initiatives enabling KhoeKhoe language speakers to contribute directly online through the development of specialised keyboards and editing tools.

Johannesburg: Showcasing Local Innovation

The visit continued in Johannesburg, where Wikimedia South Africa members presented a range of projects addressing the digital knowledge gap facing African languages and communities.

Many South African languages have rich oral traditions but limited representation in written and digital archives. Community members demonstrated how Wikimedia projects are helping address this challenge through locally led initiatives.

Decolonising Language Through Knowledge Creation

Editors showcased work on smaller and underrepresented language editions of Wikipedia, including Siswati, Tshivenda, Sepulana, and Xitsonga. Through the creation of high-quality educational content in local languages, volunteers are helping ensure that knowledge is accessible to communities in the languages they speak and understand.

Jo’burgpediA and Community Partnerships

The chapter also highlighted collaborations with universities, libraries, museums, and cultural institutions. Through initiatives such as Jo’burgpediA, students and community members are trained to document local history, ensuring that communities can tell their own stories rather than having them told by others.

Preserving Oral Knowledge

Discussions also focused on innovative approaches to documenting verified oral histories and indigenous knowledge. These efforts challenge traditional archival models that have often excluded African perspectives and lived experiences, creating new pathways for preserving cultural heritage within Wikimedia platforms.

A Global Mission Powered by Local Communities

Addressing chapter members, Bernadette Meehan emphasised the Foundation’s commitment to community-led knowledge creation and governance:

“Wikimedia’s global mission relies entirely on the local communities who understand the nuances of their own culture. Listening to the brilliant initiatives run by Wikimedia South Africa proves that the future of free knowledge is inherently multilingual and diverse.”

Her remarks recognised the vital role that local volunteers play in ensuring the internet reflects the richness and diversity of the communities it serves.

For Bobby Shabangu, the visit was also a reminder of how far the African Wikimedia movement has come.

Reflecting on his own journey, which began with editing Siswati Wikipedia because, as he puts it, “if I didn’t edit it, no one would,” Shabangu highlighted the growing influence of African contributors within global internet governance and knowledge-sharing spaces:

“We are moving past the era where Africa is merely a consumer of global knowledge. Through the hard work of our chapter members, we are ensuring that our grandfathers’ stories, our traditional customs, and our beautifully diverse languages are permanently archived for the next generation.”

Looking Ahead

The visit reaffirmed the importance of community-driven knowledge creation and the growing role South Africa is playing in shaping the future of free knowledge globally.

From ancient rock art in Cape Town to digital language preservation projects in Johannesburg, the message was clear: preserving knowledge is not only about recording the past — it is about ensuring that future generations can access, contribute to, and share their own stories.

As Wikimedia South Africa continues to champion linguistic diversity, cultural heritage, and open knowledge, partnerships between local communities and the Wikimedia Foundation will help ensure that South Africa’s rich tapestry of languages and cultures remains visible, accessible, and thriving online for decades to come.

Wiki Indaba 2026: Passing the Baobab

Joining the Wikimedia South Africa chapter were members of the core organising team for Wiki Indaba 2026 from Côte d’Ivoire, including Emmanuel Gueh and Donotein. Their participation provided an opportunity not only to engage in discussions with the South African community but also to share an update on preparations for Wiki Indaba 2026, Africa’s premier gathering of Wikimedians.

A special highlight of the visit was the ceremonial handover of the Wiki Indaba Baobab Tree statue to the new organising team. The Baobab, often referred to as the “Tree of Life” in Africa, symbolises wisdom, resilience, community, and the sharing of knowledge—values that closely align with the spirit of Wiki Indaba and the Wikimedia movement.

Wikimedia South Africa leadership proudly passed the statue to the Côte d’Ivoire organising team, marking the beginning of what is hoped will become a lasting Wiki Indaba tradition.

As the creator of Wiki Indaba, Wikimedia South Africa Board Chair and long-time Wikimedian Dumisani Ndubane reflected on the significance of the moment. He expressed his pride in inaugurating this new tradition and shared his hope that, in years to come, the Baobab statue will continue its journey across the continent before eventually returning to South Africa when Wikimedia South Africa once again hosts Wiki Indaba.

The handover symbolised more than a transfer of responsibility—it represented the continued growth of the African Wikimedia movement, the sharing of leadership across communities, and a collective commitment to ensuring that Africa’s knowledge, languages, cultures, and stories remain visible and accessible to future generations.

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available: 日本語, Bahasa Indonesia, Bahasa Melayu, Deutsch, Tiếng Việt, español, français, polski, português, português do Brasil, čeština, русский, українська, עברית, العربية, 中文

Weekly highlight

• Growth features are now available at Wikidata. This update enables access to Mentorship (if configured), Impact module, the Help Panel, and a simplified Newcomer Homepage (without Suggested Edits). Wikidata administrators are still configuring the features through Community Configuration.

Updates for editors

• The special page Special:RangeCalculator has been created. It allows users to find an IP range without needing to rely on external tools. Until now, this tool was only available to CheckUsers. [1]
• Sub-referencing is a new MediaWiki feature that allows editors to reuse references with different details. It will be deployed to most small and medium-sized Wikipedia language versions on June 23. The FAQ lists possible actions to take on your wiki to support the deployment. Check the rollout plan for the next deployment steps. [2]
• Starting next week, users will get a notification when they are blocked or unblocked from editing, or if this block changes. [3]
•  View all 32 community-submitted tasks that were resolved last week.

Updates for technical contributors

• Starting next week, abuse filters that are set to “require CAPTCHA verification” will begin to also affect users with the skipcaptcha right, which includes most autoconfirmed users. Bots are exempted. This change only affects edits that trigger an abuse filter. The skipcaptcha right will continue to exempt users from having to solve CAPTCHAs in the ordinary course of using the wikis. [4]
• Reference documentation for the Lift Wing API has moved from the API Portal to the interactive REST Sandbox.
• The API Portal wiki is now closed. For API documentation, see Wikimedia APIs on mediawiki.org. All API Portal wiki URLs (https://api.wikimedia.org/wiki/) will redirect to the mediawiki.org page starting June 22. [5]
•  Detailed code updates later this week: MediaWiki

Meetings and events

• Join an online call on 25 June at 2:30pm UTC to meet the current Wikimedia interns for Google Summer of Code and Outreachy. Interns will provide an overview of their projects and a brief demo of their work so far. Attendees are encouraged to share ideas and connections in their community.

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.